Executive Pay: The Curious Case of Carlos Ghosn’s Arrest
February 12, 2025
The Transformations Wrought About by the Digital Age This is the age of Smart Machines that can perform tasks that hitherto were being done by humans. Right from manufacturing automation where robots work on the factory floor to make products, to Artificial Intelligence driven algorithms that have predictive capabilities, and Big Data enabled Search Engines, […]
The economic power that many multinational companies wield is commendable, to say the least. Companies like Amazon and Apple have a valuation of over a trillion dollars. This is more than the GDP of most countries! Hence, in purely financial terms, multinational companies do wield tremendous influence on the day to day operations of many […]
Disaster Recovery and Business Continuity plans if well planned and implemented can help mitigate risks and loss to the business. With increasing competition and complexity of systems and reliance on IT technology, Organizations are focusing in this area to ensure they do not lose out on the business operations in the event of any disaster […]
In previous articles, we have discussed how risk management teams and the management can help in planning for contingencies. In this article, we look at the role that external consultants can play in formulating and shaping a company’s business continuity planning. For starters, the biggest advantage that external consultants have over in house risk management […]
Introduction For an organization to have an effective and efficient manufacturing unit, it is important that special attention is given to facility layout. Facility layout is an arrangement of different aspects of manufacturing in an appropriate manner as to achieve desired production results. Facility layout considers available space, final product, safety of users and facility […]
National competitiveness is becoming an important subject of debate as governments all across the world are competing with one another to gain foreign capital and resources. However, the problem is that there is no theory that correctly defines what national competitiveness is and how countries can become more competitive in the global market. It is the absence of accurate knowledge, a lot of misinformation has been doing the rounds.
Michael Porter is a famous professor of strategy at Harvard Business School. He is famous for developing the five forces model of competition for corporations. His research into how corporations build competitive advantage was path-breaking. It is for this reason that he was asked to research on how nations build competitive advantage. There were several myths and preconceived notions about this issue. In this article, we will first debunk the myths and then understand the theory proposed by Professor Porter.
The common myths pertaining to national competitiveness are as follows:
The most common view of national competitiveness is that it is highly influenced by macroeconomic variables such as exchange rates, budget deficits, interest rates, etc. They point out to the fact that countries like China have pegged their exchange rate to the United States and hence have achieved tremendous growth within a short span of time. However, there are several examples of countries that have failed despite pegging their currency to the dollar.
Also, countries like Italy and Korea are considered economically successful even though their currencies have been appreciating and interest rates are sky high. On the contrary, if a country exports a lot of goods of low value. However, its industry is incapable of producing any sophisticated goods. Then the country will have a trade surplus. However, this trade surplus will lead to lower standard of living for the people. It is therefore not advisable to focus only on exports or trade surplus.
Another view commonly used to explain national competitiveness is that it is a direct function of cheap and abundant labor. Once again the example of India and China is commonly given to explain how these third world countries are turning into economic superpowers. However, this also does not explain the complete picture. If cheap and abundant labor were the deciding factor, then countries like Germany would never have become economic superpowers.
Natural resources are often explained as being the underlying factor that helps a nation develop national competitiveness. However, countries in Africa are some of the most resource-rich countries in the world. Yet, they are the most underdeveloped and fragile economies which depend upon aid from countries which have considerably fewer natural resources than themselves.
Another common approach views management practices as the decisive factor in national competitiveness. However, it would be incorrect to say that the same set of management practices would produce the same results across industries and nations. Some practices can only be followed in certain industries whereas some others are only applicable if the scale of business grows beyond a certain level.
As per the analysis by Michael Porter, the only factor that matters in creating national competitiveness is productivity. This means that the labor and capital need to be arranged in such a way that labor can produce maximum output with minimum capital investments. Hence, neither human resources nor natural resources are decisive factors in national competitiveness by themselves. However, the manner in which they are productively used is the most important determinant which puts one nation economically in better shape as compared to the other.
Also, it needs to be noted that productivity gains are not static. Instead they are dynamic. This means that once a country finds a way to arrange labor and capital for maximum productivity, it is quickly copied by the competitors. Hence, to maintain the competitive advantage, innovation needs to be undertaken continually. To maintain its competitive edge nations need to continually innovate. They must discover and dominate new industries. For instance, America became a global superpower by manufacturing steel and automobiles. However, today it maintains its supremacy via other sophisticated industries such as finance and information technology.
It is also important to understand that national competitiveness may apply only to a few industries. This means that even though Germany has a strong economic background, there are several industries in Germany which cannot really compete internationally. This is where the country must decide to focus on its core competence. If certain goods are produced more efficiently outside the country, then a nation may be better off importing them.
Also, as productivity increases, human beings are trained to perform higher level tasks. The lower level tasks are automated, and the standard of living rises for everybody in the nation.
The new theory proposed by Michael Porter is therefore in stark contrast with the classical theory. The classical theory considered land, labor, and capital as the deciding factors for a nation. However, the new theory focuses more on entrepreneurship. The new theory can explain why nations like Dubai and Singapore are economic powerhouses whereas resource-rich countries like Ghana are struggling economically.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *