Netting, Close Out, and Acceleration
Netting is a procedure that is commonly used by organizations all over the world to reduce their counterparty credit default risk. However, in order for the netting procedure to be carried out, companies should have contracts in place prior to the default event taking place.
There is another procedure called close-out which is closely related to netting. In this article, we will have a closer look at what netting and closeout mean as well as what are the advantages related to these procedures.
What is Netting?
Netting refers to the right that a lending company has to combine all the cash flows with their counterparty in order to reach a net receivable or payable figure.
For instance, a company may have given a loan of $150 to another company. However, they are also holding $100 in deposits from that same company. If the netting agreement were not in place, the lending company would lose its $150 loan in the event of a default and would still have to pay back the $100 in order to avoid being shown as the defaulting party. This is because the two separate transactions are considered to be two separate contracts with terms and conditions which are not related to one another.
However, the netting procedure allows the different contracts to be set off against one another. This is done in order to reduce or eliminate the settlement risk. The end result of netting is that contracts with negative mark to market values as well as the ones with positive mark to market values are combined together. The end result is a single net payable or receivable which would offset all the open items between the two parties.
What is a Closeout?
A closeout is a procedure that is closely related to netting. The only difference is that closeout can happen before an actual default takes place. A closeout allows the company to stop servicing all contracts with a counterparty as soon as it is close to default. For instance, if a company is close to defaulting on its debt, the counterparty can stop shipping any more goods even though the sale may have happened.
The closeout procedure allows the company to void the contract if certain pre-defined events take place. Hence, a close-out is a contract that reduces the pre-settlement risk. The idea behind a closeout is that if a company is reaching close to default, the credit exposure to it should be minimized. In such a scenario, continuing to fulfill the obligations of an old contract would increase the exposure and aggravate the risk.
A closeout netting contract may also have a clause wherein the defaulting party may be under obligation to find a suitable counterparty for the contract. They may be legally required to pay the additional transaction costs as well as the difference which are arising because of the closeout. This additional cost is recovered using what is known as a compensation claim.
The closeout agreements may also have an accelerated clause inbuilt into them. As per this clause, companies can push forward the date of future payables and make them due immediately. This is done with the intent of recouping as much cash as possible before the company actually goes into default. However, it often results in bringing the company closer to the brink of disaster. There is a difference between close-out and acceleration. The difference is that under the acceleration clause, the underlying contracts still remain valid whereas in a closeout the contracts become voidable at the discretion of one party.
Netting in Case of Derivatives
The netting procedure is often mentioned in the derivatives contract. However, it is only useful if the derivative contract has the possibility of having a negative mark to market value. For some derivative instruments like options, there is no possibility of having a negative mark to market value. Hence, in such cases, the netting procedure is not of much use. However, even in such cases, companies still include netting in their contracts. This may happen because of the following reasons:
These companies intend to execute more agreements with the same counterparty over a period of time. Hence, there is an assumption that at some point of time in the future, they might execute a contract that might have a negative mark to market value and the netting provision might become useful
The netting contract can also be used to reverse the option contract. When companies use netting, they can ask the counterparty to enter into a reverse contract. This contract will have exactly the reverse terms as compared to an earlier contract. Because of netting provisions, these two contracts can be set off against each other and all credit, as well as market risks, can be eliminated
The fact of the matter is that netting, close-out, and acceleration clauses in contracts are very useful for companies who are trying to manage their credit risk better.
|❮❮ Previous||Next ❯❯|
Authorship/Referencing - About the Author(s)
The article is Written By Prachi Juneja and Reviewed By Management Study Guide Content Team. MSG Content Team comprises experienced Faculty Member, Professionals and Subject Matter Experts. We are a ISO 2001:2015 Certified Education Provider. To Know more, click on About Us. The use of this material is free for learning and education purpose. Please reference authorship of content used, including link(s) to ManagementStudyGuide.com and the content page url.
- Risk Management - Introduction
- Benefits of Risk Management
- Principles of Risk Management
- Risk Management Process
- Risk Identification and Assessment
- Aspects of Risk Management
- Steps in Risk Management Process
- Approaches to Risk Management
- Risk Management Policy
- Commonly Used Measures of Risk
- Risk Management Plan
- Evaluation of Risk Management Plan
- Risk Treatment
- Role of HRD in Risk Management
- Enterprise Risk Management
- Implementing ERM
- Risk Management and Stock Market
- Outsourcing Risk Management Program
- Risk Management as a Profession
- Anticipating and Mitigating Organizational Risks in the Digital Age
- Challenges Facing the Australian Economy
- The Economic Costs of MeToo
- Automated Claims Processing
- Challenges in Global Insurance And International Claims
- Conflicts of Interest in the Insurance Business
- The Cost Structure in the Insurance Industry
- How Drones Will Impact the Insurance Industry?
- How Is Health Insurance Funded?
- How Self Driving Cars Impact Insurance?
- How Stock Market Volatility Affects Insurance Companies?
- Insurance Agents vs. Insurance Brokers
- The ABCs of Insurance Fraud in India
- Technological Advances in the Insurance Industry
- The Basics of Unemployment Insurance
- The Pros and Cons of Unemployment Assistance and Why it Matters in the Present Times
- The Role of Insurance In #MeToo Movement
- Why the Flood Insurance Market should be Privatized?
- Basics of Pet Insurance
- Cannabis Insurance
- Challenges Facing Cryptocurrency Insurance
- Evolution of Insurance Regulation
- Food Delivery Apps and Insurance
- How Does Captive Insurance Work?
- On-Demand Insurance
- Reinsurance vs. Double Insurance
- Solvency Regulations in the Insurance Industry
- Terrorism and Insurance
- The Basics of Microinsurance
- The Basics of Reinsurance
- Types of Captive Insurance Companies
- What is P2P Insurance?
- How Risks Affect Companies Providing Financial Services
- Risk Management Information System
- Disadvantages of Risk Management Information Systems
- The Known-Unknown Classification of Risk
- Operational Risk: Definition and Drivers
- How Regulations Have Affected Operational Risk?
- Identification of Operational Risks
- How to Identify Operational Risks
- Using Internal Loss Data to Mitigate Operational Risks
- External Loss Data in Operational Risk Management
- Risk Control Self Assessment (RCSA)
- Scenario Analysis in Risk Management
- Key Risk Indicators
- Basel Approaches in Operational Risk Management
- The Basel Risk Categories
- Cause Categories in Operational Risk Management
- Loss Distribution Approach
- The COSO Framework for Internal Control
- Mistakes to be Avoided While Building a Risk Management System
- Credit Rating Terminology
- Types of Exposures to Determine Credit Limit
- Types of Credit Events
- Active Credit Portfolio Risk Management
- Metrics to Measure Credit Risk
- Credit Derivatives: An Introduction
- Credit Linked Note
- How do Credit Default Swaps Work?
- Why are Credit Default Swaps Dangerous?
- Total Returns Swap
- What are Collateralized Debt Obligations and How do they Work?
- Collateralized Debt Obligations: Advantages and Disadvantages
- Mark To Market Accounting
- What are Recovery Rates? - Different Types of Recovery Rates
- Netting, Close Out, and Acceleration
- Expected Default Frequency (EDF)
- Expected Default Frequency: Advantages and Disadvantages
- Altmans Z Score Model
- Unexpected Loss and Economic Capital Buffer
- Stress Testing in Credit Risk Management
- Provisioning in Credit Risk Management
- How Corporate Governance Impacts Credit Risk
- Exit Strategies In Credit Risk Management
- What is Market Risk? - How its Measured and Sources of Market Risk
- Why is Market Risk Management Important?
- Introduction to Value At Risk (VaR)
- The Three Types of Value at Risk (VaR)
- Marginal, Incremental and Component Value at Risk (VAR)
- How Value at Risk (VaR) is Implemented?
- Backtesting Value at Risk (VaR)
- Advantages of Using Value at Risk (VaR) Model
- Disadvantages of Using the Value at Risk (VaR) Model
- How Margins Are Calculated Using Value at Risk (VaR)
- Market Risk Limits
- Tail Risk
- The Upside of Market Volatility
- Relationship between Volatility and Risk
- Importance of Data Quality in Risk Management
- Impact of Using Poor Quality Data and Metrics to Measure Data Quality
- Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) vs Traditional Risk Management
- Benefits of Enterprise Risk Management
- Corporate Risk Governance
- International Risk Governance Committee (IRGC) Framework
- Failure of Market Risk Management
- Mistakes to Avoid in Risk Management