MSG Team's other articles

11776 Advantages and Disadvantages of Virtual Teams

Virtual team is an emerging new-age trend with followers across business sectors. Just like any other new trend, virtual team also has to undergo strict scrutiny of researchers to weigh its advantages and disadvantages before being accepted by the professionals. The advantages and disadvantages of virtual teams can be looked upon from three levels – […]

12353 Approaches to Reinsurance Regulation

The reinsurance industry is a very important part of the structure of the insurance industry of any country. It is the reinsurance industry that provides the much-required stability and backup capital that enables insurance companies to underwrite more business. Hence, the regulation of reinsurance companies and the reinsurance business is equally important when compared to […]

8894 Democratic and Socialist Goals of Public Administration

The role and functions of the Government and the bureaucracy is that which keeps constantly evolving in the wake of developments and changes in and around the world. During our discourse we have seen how the academic discipline of public administration has evolved. It has undergone reforms and has been influenced by developments in other […]

9415 Fundamentals of Business Agility

Volatility is most likely to remain constant and so is change. The market turbulence has posed challenges to most businesses around the world. But it has also played an important role in the emergence of new and non-traditional businesses – businesses that know how to respond quickly to the changing environment; businesses that have ability […]

8893 Democracy or Dictatorship? Which is Better for Economic Growth of Nations

Dictatorship or Democracy? The Debate Continues over Which System Promotes Growth If we look at the history of economic development of nations over the last hundred years or so, we find that different nations have taken different trajectories in their pursuit of economic growth. While countries such as China opened up their economies and at […]

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

The term new public management was coined by scholars from UK and Australia (Hood 1991 and Hood and Jackson 1991), who were working in the in the areas of public administration. Now, the origin of this new term was to propose a new point of view towards the organizational design in the public sector, however after a decade, the meaning of this term in discussions and debates became many.

Some scholars choose to define it as the introduction of new institutional economics to public management and some used it to refer to pattern changes in policy making. Before we make an effort to further understand the various aspects of New Public Management, let us see how it is different from the traditional public administration.

The new public management which emerged in the 1980s represented an attempt to make the public sector more businesslike and to improve the efficiency of the Government borrowed ideas and management models from the private sector. It emphasized the centrality of citizens who were the recipient of the services or customers to the public sector.

New public management system also proposed a more decentralized control of resources and exploring other service delivery models to achieve better results, including a quasi-market structure where public and private service providers competed with each other in an attempt to provide better and faster services. [For e.g. In UK the purchase and provision of healthcare was split up between National Health Services or NHS and Government funded GP fund holders, this increased efficiency as the hospitals now needed to provide low cost procedures to win both patients and funds.)

The core themes for the New Public Management were:

  • A strong focus on financial control, value for money and increasing efficiency

  • A command and control mode of functioning, identifying and setting targets and continuance monitoring of performance, handing over the power to the senior management

  • Introducing audits at both financial and professional levels, using transparent means to review performances, setting benchmarks, using protocols to ameliorate professional behavior

  • Greater customer orientation and responsiveness and increasing the scope of roles played by non public sector providers

  • Deregulating the labor market, replacing collective agreements to individual rewards packages at senior levels combined with short term contracts

  • Discouraging the self regulatory power of the professionals and handing over the power from individuals to management

  • Encouraging more entrepreneurial management than beurocracy with high retrospective accountability requirements upwards

  • Introducing new forms of corporate governance, introducing a board model of functioning and concentrating the power to the strategic core of the organization

With changing times newer aspects were included in the NPM model mentioned above as well and what the scholars term as NPM model 2 was brought in. The critical aspects of this new model were:

  • Introduction of a more elaborate and evolved quasi-market system

  • Creation of more fragmented or loosely contracted public sector organizations at the local level setting in a change from management of hierarchy to management of contract

  • Distinguishing between the small strategic core and the large organizational periphery, market testing and contracting out the non strategic functions

  • Delayering and downsizing

  • Introduction of new managerial concepts like Management by Influence, creating network for of organizations, creating strategic alliances between the organizations

  • Moving away from standardized service forms to more flexible and varied service forms

Now, as more and more work was done in the areas of Human Resources and Relations and popular texts which stressed on the need of excellence, the importance of organizational culture, values, vision and the concept of Learning Organization introduced by Peter Senge (1990) influenced the new public management as well and therefore suitable changed were also suggested in the theory by the scholars.

  • In a bottom up form of organization- Organizational development and learning was gaining importance. Organizational culture was seen as a glue which holds the organization together, judging the performance by results etc were the new point of views

  • In the top down form of organization- Securing changes in organizational culture was cited as important, clarifying and projecting the vision and leadership from top to down was asked for, private sector emerged as a role model for the neo style public sector, training, corporate logos, communication strategies, assertive HR and all the other aspects that are characteristic jargon of private sector were encouraged to be adopted

So, basically the new public management was a radical movement to change not just the way a public sector functions but also the entire perception about it.

Article Written by

MSG Team

An insightful writer passionate about sharing expertise, trends, and tips, dedicated to inspiring and informing readers through engaging and thoughtful content.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Comparative Public Administration

MSG Team

The Closed and Open Models of Public Administration

MSG Team

Classical Theory of Public Administration

MSG Team