MSG Team's other articles

10703 Preventing Fall Outs in a Team

An individual alone can’t create wonders. He needs the support of others as well to discuss things and evaluate the pros and cons of his thoughts and concepts. Individuals should work together without fighting with each other for the timely accomplishment of a task. The team members must be focused and concentrate on their work […]

11272 Sigmund Freud-Founder of Psychoanalysis and his Theories

Sigmund Freud was born in 1856 in Austria, but lived mainly in Vienna. The founder of Psychoanalysis school of thought earned his medical degree in 1881 and became a neurologist. Upon completing his graduation, he started his private practice and treated his patients having psychological problems. The key concepts which were introduced by Sigmund Freud […]

10456 Netting, Close Out, and Acceleration

Netting is a procedure that is commonly used by organizations all over the world to reduce their counterparty credit default risk. However, in order for the netting procedure to be carried out, companies should have contracts in place prior to the default event taking place. There is another procedure called close-out which is closely related […]

9594 How do Credit Default Swaps Work?

Credit derivatives were created in order to transfer the credit risk inherent in an instrument from one party to another without actually transferring the ownership of these assets. Prior to credit derivatives, there was no mechanism to isolate the credit risk of any financial instrument. Credit default swaps were amongst the first structured finance derivative […]

10632 What is Personnel Administration ?

Employees form the core and the backbone of any organization and public organizations are no different. According to authors William Mosher and J. Donald Kingsley, the key to better governance lies in effective personnel management. For effective personnel administration there are certain criteria that need to be fulfilled like: Highly qualified workforce of civil servants […]

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

The term new public management was coined by scholars from UK and Australia (Hood 1991 and Hood and Jackson 1991), who were working in the in the areas of public administration. Now, the origin of this new term was to propose a new point of view towards the organizational design in the public sector, however after a decade, the meaning of this term in discussions and debates became many.

Some scholars choose to define it as the introduction of new institutional economics to public management and some used it to refer to pattern changes in policy making. Before we make an effort to further understand the various aspects of New Public Management, let us see how it is different from the traditional public administration.

The new public management which emerged in the 1980s represented an attempt to make the public sector more businesslike and to improve the efficiency of the Government borrowed ideas and management models from the private sector. It emphasized the centrality of citizens who were the recipient of the services or customers to the public sector.

New public management system also proposed a more decentralized control of resources and exploring other service delivery models to achieve better results, including a quasi-market structure where public and private service providers competed with each other in an attempt to provide better and faster services. [For e.g. In UK the purchase and provision of healthcare was split up between National Health Services or NHS and Government funded GP fund holders, this increased efficiency as the hospitals now needed to provide low cost procedures to win both patients and funds.)

The core themes for the New Public Management were:

  • A strong focus on financial control, value for money and increasing efficiency

  • A command and control mode of functioning, identifying and setting targets and continuance monitoring of performance, handing over the power to the senior management

  • Introducing audits at both financial and professional levels, using transparent means to review performances, setting benchmarks, using protocols to ameliorate professional behavior

  • Greater customer orientation and responsiveness and increasing the scope of roles played by non public sector providers

  • Deregulating the labor market, replacing collective agreements to individual rewards packages at senior levels combined with short term contracts

  • Discouraging the self regulatory power of the professionals and handing over the power from individuals to management

  • Encouraging more entrepreneurial management than beurocracy with high retrospective accountability requirements upwards

  • Introducing new forms of corporate governance, introducing a board model of functioning and concentrating the power to the strategic core of the organization

With changing times newer aspects were included in the NPM model mentioned above as well and what the scholars term as NPM model 2 was brought in. The critical aspects of this new model were:

  • Introduction of a more elaborate and evolved quasi-market system

  • Creation of more fragmented or loosely contracted public sector organizations at the local level setting in a change from management of hierarchy to management of contract

  • Distinguishing between the small strategic core and the large organizational periphery, market testing and contracting out the non strategic functions

  • Delayering and downsizing

  • Introduction of new managerial concepts like Management by Influence, creating network for of organizations, creating strategic alliances between the organizations

  • Moving away from standardized service forms to more flexible and varied service forms

Now, as more and more work was done in the areas of Human Resources and Relations and popular texts which stressed on the need of excellence, the importance of organizational culture, values, vision and the concept of Learning Organization introduced by Peter Senge (1990) influenced the new public management as well and therefore suitable changed were also suggested in the theory by the scholars.

  • In a bottom up form of organization- Organizational development and learning was gaining importance. Organizational culture was seen as a glue which holds the organization together, judging the performance by results etc were the new point of views

  • In the top down form of organization- Securing changes in organizational culture was cited as important, clarifying and projecting the vision and leadership from top to down was asked for, private sector emerged as a role model for the neo style public sector, training, corporate logos, communication strategies, assertive HR and all the other aspects that are characteristic jargon of private sector were encouraged to be adopted

So, basically the new public management was a radical movement to change not just the way a public sector functions but also the entire perception about it.

Article Written by

MSG Team

An insightful writer passionate about sharing expertise, trends, and tips, dedicated to inspiring and informing readers through engaging and thoughtful content.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Comparative Public Administration

MSG Team

The Closed and Open Models of Public Administration

MSG Team

Classical Theory of Public Administration

MSG Team