Related Articles

Benefits of Participative Management Benefits of Participative Management Participative management as a decision making style is not welcome by one and all! Labor or trade unions, for example do not approve of this. They argue that it is in fact disadvantageous to welfare of the workers because the participative processes give deep insights to the management, which in turn puts the latter in… Reasons for Failure of Participative Management Reasons for Failure of Participative Management Participative management is an effective decision making tool. It is often the managers who implement it the wrong way. Participative management calls for a change and this change can not come overnight. You require patience and consistency before employees realize the usefulness of the management style. Scope of Participative Management Scope of Participative Management The scope of participative style of management certainly depends on the organization, its nature, functions and processes. Though associating employees at every stage of decision-making is not possible still regular exchange of information, ideas, consultations, thoughts, decisions and negotiations between employer and the employees definitely is a boon to the organization. Few of the world’s… Pre-requisites of Participative Management Pre-requisites of Participative Management Participative management can best be described as a style of decision making that ensures that involvement of stakeholders at all levels. This operates at three levels, Problem analysis, strategy formulation and final implementation of the solution. There are certain prerequisites to be met before participative management can be put to work. Participative management first of… Objectives of Participative Management Objectives of Participative Management Participative management acts as a force to motivate employees to meet specific organizational goals. The main idea behind this style of management is not only using physical capital but also making optimum utilization of intellectual and emotional human capital. This is the process of involving people in decision making process to ensure that everyone’s psychological…

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

Participative management in itself does not ensure success and should not be seen as tool to create magic within no time. There is certain ground preparation required before an organization can decide for implementation of the management style.

The following things need to be taken care of:

  1. Clearly Defined Objectives: Each party to decision making called as the participants namely the management and the workers must have clearly defined objectives. Operationally there should be no clash between the objectives of the two.

  2. Clear Communication: There should be clear and timely communication between the management and the workers or the employees. This helps in building trust between the two parties. Workers also gain a sense of responsibility increasing their stake in their work and in the organization as a whole.

  3. Choosing the Representative: It is important for the workers to choose their representative from among themselves and not any person from outside the labor union. This is important for two reasons. First, the person is able to better understand the problems of his colleagues and report the same to the management. Second, the management is keener to talk and listen from a person who works within the organization.

  4. Training the Workers: Training and awareness regarding the usefulness of participative management is required to make it more effective. Further training is required to ensure that every person at every level knows his what contribution he/she has to make. For example, participation at the level of middle management is different compared to participation at lower or top level.

  5. Confidence: Both parties workers and the management need a trust to develop between the two. Participation should not be perceived as intimidation to the position of any. If workers think that their status will be adversely affected, they refuse to participate. Similarly, if managers suspect that they will lose their authority, they will decline to participate.

  6. Increasing Workers Participation: Workers participation needs to be increased at each level in order to encourage them to contribute meaningfully. Further, their suggestions and recommendations need to be treated with dignity and respect. Nothing can be more motivating than seeing your recommendation being put to practice.

  7. Legal Action: Since participative management requires structural and cultural change which takes time. There is resistance to change offered by the employees especially those who perceive it as a threat to their status and authority within the organization. If allowed to take shape a natural speed, it will take time to show results. Therefore, some legislative action is required against the erring employees.

  8. Ensuring ROI: Participation should not be at the cost of the values of the organization. It has to be carefully planned; employees should devote a certain time for participation and the rest upon their own specific area of work.

Participative management may be a solution for each and every type of organization. It is a big challenge in big organizations with big employee size. The implementation needs to be carefully planned and implemented gradually.

Author Avatar

Article Written by

Ram Mohan Susarla

Ram Mohan Susarla is a seasoned freelance writer with nearly 18 years of experience creating content across diverse domains, including business, management, and literature. Before transitioning fully into writing, he spent over a decade in the corporate world, working with Fortune 100 companies as an Analyst and Project Leader. With an academic background in Engineering and professional training in Management, Ram brings analytical depth, strategic thinking, and clarity to his writing. His ability to translate complex management concepts into accessible, reader-friendly content has made him a valued contributor since the inception of Management Study Group.


Article Written by

Ram Mohan Susarla

Ram Mohan Susarla is a seasoned freelance writer with nearly 18 years of experience creating content across diverse domains, including business, management, and literature. Before transitioning fully into writing, he spent over a decade in the corporate world, working with Fortune 100 companies as an Analyst and Project Leader. With an academic background in Engineering and professional training in Management, Ram brings analytical depth, strategic thinking, and clarity to his writing. His ability to translate complex management concepts into accessible, reader-friendly content has made him a valued contributor since the inception of Management Study Group.

Author Avatar

Article Written by

Ram Mohan Susarla

Ram Mohan Susarla is a seasoned freelance writer with nearly 18 years of experience creating content across diverse domains, including business, management, and literature. Before transitioning fully into writing, he spent over a decade in the corporate world, working with Fortune 100 companies as an Analyst and Project Leader. With an academic background in Engineering and professional training in Management, Ram brings analytical depth, strategic thinking, and clarity to his writing. His ability to translate complex management concepts into accessible, reader-friendly content has made him a valued contributor since the inception of Management Study Group.

Author Avatar

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Management Study Guide