MSG Team's other articles

10808 Pros and Cons of Freemium Model

In the previous article, we have already learned what a freemium business model is. We now know that this model is widely used amongst the start-up community. We also know that this business model has several variations. In this article, we will have a closer look at what are the pros and cons of a […]

9496 Green Pensions

The amount of money that is managed by pension funds is huge. Since pension funds have large amounts of money which they can use to invest in the market, they are known for being trendsetters in the investment community. It is for this reason that pension funds are being used by governments all over the […]

10350 Mergers and Acquisitions: A New Perspective

The nature of mergers and acquisition activity has drastically changed over the past few years. Earlier, most of the mergers and acquisitions happened because companies wanted to do horizontal or vertical integration. They either wanted to team up with their competitors and enjoy economies of scale, or they wanted to team up with their suppliers […]

11393 Straight Through Processing in Commercial Lending

Commercial banks all over the world have been forced to adapt to increasing changes in technology. This is because technological changes are shaking the very foundation of the commercial banking industry. However, since commercial banks have been reactive i.e. they have been responding to changes in the environment instead of proactively accepting them, a lot […]

9213 Estimating Project Cash Flows: Part 1

Prima facie, capital budgeting may seem like a very simple task. After all, it has just 3 steps. The first is to find the cash flows, the second is to find the appropriate discount rate that represents the time value and riskiness of those cash flows and the third step is to use both these […]

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

It is often believed that the role of the investment banker is to sell the company for the highest price. The conventional belief is that the higher the price, the more successful the issue has been. However, over the years, the management of issuing companies, as well as investment bankers, have painfully discovered that a higher price post an IPO does not necessarily mean that a company is doing well. Instead, a higher price post an IPO can lead to a wide variety of problems. Some of these problems have been mentioned in this article.

  1. Sell-Off and Over Correction: The insiders of a company often know its true worth. Once the company does go public, this information is available to informed investors as well.

    If the informed investors find that the stock is grossly overvalued and there is very little possibility that the fundamental value of the stock will ever catch up to what is currently being offered at the market, they will start selling.

    We have already studied in previous articles that institutional, as well as informed investors, tend to have large holdings of the stock of major companies. If they start selling the stock, then the market will be flooded with stock for sale. The end result would be an overcorrection, which would lead the price to crash.

    In short, the overvaluation of a share is a temporary phenomenon that would sooner or later become the cause of a crash.

  2. Unrealistic Expectations: If the investors in the company start believing the hype, i.e., if they also start believing that the overvaluation of the company is actually the real valuation, then another set of problems starts appearing.

    The investors start expecting a higher standard of returns from the companies. This higher expectation is seen in the form of pressure that is built around the quarterly results.

    The company would be forced to undertake riskier projects in order to satisfy the need for a higher IRR and cash flow, which would ultimately justify the higher valuation. Over time, it is likely that the risky projects being undertaken would do more harm than good.

  3. Leads to Fraud: In many cases, the management of overvalued companies are not able to obtain higher returns even from high-risk projects. This is when the pressure to keep the numbers up forces them to start following questionable accounting practices. This ultimately leads to fraud and, in many cases, has led to the complete bankruptcy of the overvalued company.

    Instead of fudging numbers in order to live up to the hype, these companies would have been better off had they simply admitted the overvaluation and allowed the stock to settle at a fairly valued price.

    Almost all companies which end up committing fraud start doing it just to meet the high expectations set up by the investors as a result of the overvaluation. Companies like Enron, WorldCom, and Waste Management are testimony to this face!

  4. Poorly Designed Acquisitions: There are some companies that try to use their overvalued stocks smartly. They are well aware that the overvaluation is temporary and that sooner or later, someone will realize that the shares are overvalued, and the prices will correct. Hence, they try to make use of the higher stock price before it is called out. This is done by undertaking mergers and acquisitions and paying for them in stock.

    For instance, if company A has an overvalued share, it will try to exchange its overvalued shares for the real assets of company B. By doing so, it would have pre-empted the market. By the time the market realizes that the shares are overvalued, the company would have already acquired real valuable assets as a result of the overvaluation. Sometimes these strategies do succeed.

    However, over time, the market has realized that if a company is hurriedly undertaking an acquisition and is using its stock to pay for it, the company is probably overvalued. Hence, the announcement of such a deal leads to a correction in the value of the acquirer’s shares. Also, even if the deal goes through, these acquisitions often fail. This is because these acquisitions are carried out in a hurried manner. Hence, they often lack due diligence, and something or the other goes wrong in this complex process of acquisition.

  5. Promoter Sales: Last but not least, higher valuation leads promoters to abandon the company.

    In many cases, it has been seen that when the valuation is particularly high, promoters sell their shares. This is done to encash the shares at a higher valuation and then later use the proceeds to buy even more shares when the valuation actually settles down. However, there is a time lag between selling the shares and then actually buying them back. There is a chance that the promoter may misappropriate the funds in this time lag.

    Also, since direct selling of promoters’ shares is reported, some promoters pledge their shares to liquidate them when the valuation gets high. In many parts of the world, these pledging transactions also have to be reported.

The bottom line is that the task of the investment banker is to ensure that the shares of the company trade at a fair valuation once they are listed. The drawbacks of being undervalued are obvious. However, there are several drawbacks to the shares being overvalued as well.

Article Written by

MSG Team

An insightful writer passionate about sharing expertise, trends, and tips, dedicated to inspiring and informing readers through engaging and thoughtful content.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Conflict of Interest in Investment Banking

MSG Team

The Components of an Investment Bank

MSG Team

Chinese Walls in Investment Banking

MSG Team