Convertible Notes and Startup Funding
February 12, 2025
The Silicon Valley Bank crisis has prompted the Federal Reserve to evaluate its emergency funding program. The original emergency funding program i.e. the discount window was obviously not sufficient to provide funding to failing banks such as the Silicon Valley Bank. This is the reason that the bank ended up failing. The Fed felt the […]
Catastrophe bonds are one of the most sophisticated tools used by the insurance company in order to protect itself from mounting losses. The fact that more than $12 billion worth of catastrophe bonds have been issued in the year 2019 is a testimony to their popularity. Catastrophe bonds are a form of ultra-high-risk debt which […]
From the previous articles, we already know that money markets form an integral part of the overall financial system. Also because of their large volumes and high ratio of demand deposits, the money market funds are always at the risk of a run. It is for this reason that the Securities and Exchange Commission has […]
Legal costs have long been a deterrent for people wanting to file lawsuits. In a country like America, the legal fees can be significant. A lot of good lawyers charge hourly fees. Many plaintiffs believe that in an hourly fee system, the lawyer is incentivized to drag the case for as long as possible. This […]
We often read about how electronic and software based trading is the norm in stock or equity markets as well as currency and other financial markets. Indeed, anyone who is remotely connected with the stock market or for that matter any financial market would know that there are trading systems and trading software that help […]
First-time investors are quite anxious to raise funding for their projects. The fact that professional investors are looking to invest in their projects can be quite overwhelming for some founders. As a result, it is common for these founders to believe that the investors are acting in good faith. Often, this means that the investors end up signing agreements without having access to proper legal counsel. This is not advisable since it is a known fact that many investors create term sheets and agreements which are completely skewed in their favor.
These one-sided term sheets are so common in the marketplace that there is a specific term for them. They are commonly referred to as “dirty term sheets”. It is important for the founders to be aware of the common pitfalls which need to be taken into account while signing term sheets.
Some of the common red flags that investors need to look out for have been explained in this article:
It is important for the founders to ensure that their lawyers have access to the agreement so that they can fully understand the implications of what they sign.
It may be possible that the investors might obtain exclusive access to a deal by paying a small amount even though they do not have the full amount required by the startup. They may then start approaching bigger investors in order to sell this stake at a premium. It is also possible that the investor is not able to raise further funds. In such cases, the startup would be stuck without funds during their growth stage since they cannot seek external funding.
There may be clauses in the agreement which stipulate that a certain amount of penalty needs to be paid. Investors acting in good faith do not include such clauses in the term sheets. This is because they do not expect the founders to cancel the term sheet before the agreement. Investors who use dirty term sheets know that at some point in time, the founders may want to bail out. This is the reason that they are ensuring that the terms are skewed in their favor if the founder wants to exit the arrangement.
Entrepreneurs can raise more funds at later stages if they are willing to cede control to other investors as well. However, if early-stage investors have taken up excessive control, obtaining funding at later stages can be quite difficult. It is unusual for investors to ask for a lot of seats on the board of directors particularly when investing in early-stage startups. The founders should consider this to be a red flag.
Let’s say that an investor buys a 50% stake in a company for $50 million. This means that the entire company is valued at $100 million. Now, if the company is sold for $75 million and the investor has a 1× liquidation multiplier, then the calculation will be as follows:
Hence, in effect, the investors will get $62.5 million and the rest will get $12.5 million. To some extent, this is necessary to provide downside protection to the investors. A liquidation multiplier of 1× is considered to be fair in the investing community.
However, if this liquidation multiplier is set at 2× or 3×, it becomes predatory. Let’s have a look at how the calculation will work in the case of a 2× multiplier.
Entrepreneurs should not sign deals where the liquidation multiplier is more than 1×. This is because in such cases, there is a high probability that they will end up losing money.
Preferred shareholders have a higher claim on the cash flow of the firm. They receive the dividends first before any other shareholders are paid. Then, they also receive the dividend which is paid to common stockholders.
Since participating common stocks receive twice the dividend, they have a higher valuation as compared to other stocks. Once again entrepreneurs must refrain from issuing participating common stock since it reduces the valuation of the other common stock.
A partial ratchet is similar to a full ratchet. However, in this case, the stake of the investor can be partially diluted based on a certain pre-decided formula. Additional shares will automatically be issued to the earlier investors in order for them to maintain their original investment percentage. These additional shares are issued free of cost.
Needless to say that if the investor is not paying for these shares, they are coming out of the pocket of the entrepreneur and other stakeholders. The full ratchet can create a lot of problems for the company in later stages. This is because every time the entrepreneur raises money a part of that ends up flowing to the original investor. It also acts as a deterrent for newer investors to invest in the company.
A full ratchet is often used by predatory investors to scare away potential investors. This means that the company will have to use the same investors for later rounds of funding. This will provide the investor with an opportunity to undervalue the firm since there will not be any competition to challenge its valuation. Entrepreneurs typically refrain from signing any term sheets where either a full ratchet or a partial ratchet has been mentioned.
The above-mentioned types of clauses are considered to be predatory under the normal course of business. However, they can be considered to be fair if the business is very risky and both parties agree to it, they can be used to make the investors feel safe. It is imperative that the entrepreneur be aware of the types of risks that they may end up facing in the future.
The bottom line is that entrepreneurs should not be overwhelmed if they receive interest from investors. They must carefully evaluate the term sheet in order to understand the various scenarios mentioned in the agreement and be on the lookout for commonly mentioned red flags.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *