MSG Team's other articles

11784 Volatility, Uncertainty, Complexity and Ambiguity (VUCA) Paradigm for Leadership

The Volatility, Uncertainty, Complexity and Ambiguity (VUCA) Paradigm Business leaders in the 21st century operate in a vastly different terrain than those who led their companies to success in the earlier decades. The landscape that confronts the business leaders of today is characterized by what is known as the VUCA principle or the Volatility, Uncertainty, […]

10466 New Public Management Model

The term new public management was coined by scholars from UK and Australia (Hood 1991 and Hood and Jackson 1991), who were working in the in the areas of public administration. Now, the origin of this new term was to propose a new point of view towards the organizational design in the public sector, however […]

10923 Reinsurance and Foreign Exchange Risks

All insurance companies face foreign exchange risks to some extent. However, all insurance companies are not equally concerned about foreign risks. This is because, for most insurance companies, the risks as well as the premiums are collected in the same currency. Generally, the business of an insurance company tends to be managed locally. However, this […]

10528 Organizational Change and Transition Management

The process of Transition Management involves the implementation of change through systematic planning, organizing and implementation of change to reach the desirable future state without affecting the continuity of business during the process of change. The process of transition management begins much before the actual change occurs and the members of the senior management play […]

12822 What is Compassionate Capitalism and Why We Need it in These Times of Planetary Crisis ?

What is Compassionate Capitalism and What Does it Entail for us? In recent years, there has been much talk about Capitalism evolving into a model of economy wherein corporations ensure that communitarian and people oriented business models are embraced so that profit is not the only criterion or reason why they are in business. In […]

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

Reinforcement theory of motivation was proposed by BF Skinner and his associates. It states that individual’s behaviour is a function of its consequences. It is based on “law of effect”, i.e, individual’s behaviour with positive consequences tends to be repeated, but individual’s behaviour with negative consequences tends not to be repeated.

Reinforcement theory of motivation overlooks the internal state of individual, i.e., the inner feelings and drives of individuals are ignored by Skinner. This theory focuses totally on what happens to an individual when he takes some action.

Thus, according to Skinner, the external environment of the organization must be designed effectively and positively so as to motivate the employee.

This theory is a strong tool for analyzing controlling mechanism for individual’s behaviour. However, it does not focus on the causes of individual’s behaviour.

The managers use the following methods for controlling the behaviour of the employees:

Positive Reinforcement- This implies giving a positive response when an individual shows positive and required behaviour. For example - Immediately praising an employee for coming early for job. This will increase probability of outstanding behaviour occurring again.

Reward is a positive reinforce, but not necessarily. If and only if the employees’ behaviour improves, reward can said to be a positive reinforcer. Positive reinforcement stimulates occurrence of a behaviour. It must be noted that more spontaneous is the giving of reward, the greater reinforcement value it has.

Negative Reinforcement- This implies rewarding an employee by removing negative / undesirable consequences.Both positive and negative reinforcement can be used for increasing desirable/required behaviour.
Punishment- It implies removing positive consequences so as to lower the probability of repeating undesirable behaviour in future.

In other words, punishment means applying undesirable consequence for showing undesirable behaviour.

For instance - Suspending an employee for breaking the organizational rules. Punishment can be equalized by positive reinforcement from alternative source.

Extinction- It implies absence of reinforcements.

In other words, extinction implies lowering the probability of undesired behaviour by removing reward for that kind of behaviour.

For instance - if an employee no longer receives praise and admiration for his good work, he may feel that his behaviour is generating no fruitful consequence. Extinction may unintentionally lower desirable behaviour.

Implications of Reinforcement Theory

Reinforcement theory explains in detail how an individual learns behaviour. Managers who are making attempt to motivate the employees must ensure that they do not reward all employees simultaneously. They must tell the employees what they are not doing correct. They must tell the employees how they can achieve positive reinforcement.

Article Written by

MSG Team

An insightful writer passionate about sharing expertise, trends, and tips, dedicated to inspiring and informing readers through engaging and thoughtful content.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles