MSG Team's other articles

9500 What is Group Discussion and How is it Different from a Debate

Hiring is not an easy process as it seems to be. For hiring a suitable candidate, recruiters may conduct several rounds to assess the skills of that person, so that the company is sure enough that it is choosing the appropriate candidate for the vacant position. Group Discussion is a part of the hiring process, […]

9690 How to Build a Successful Knowledge Management System

Example of a Successful Knowledge Management System: Infosys The previous articles in this module introduced the term knowledge management and presented some real world examples of how knowledge management works in contemporary organizations. This article examines the ways and means to build a successful knowledge management system and the process by which essential components of […]

10086 Job Role as a Driver of Employee Engagement

All of us have heard the story of 3 brick-layers who were working side by side when a passer-by asked them what they were doing. The first said – “I am laying bricks” The second said – “I am feeding my family” The third said – “I am building a cathedral” This simple story conveys […]

12388 Attrition and Compensation Management

Many studies have found that there is a direct causal linkage between the levels of compensation that a firm pays and the rate of attrition that it has. Attrition can be voluntary and involuntary, where the former is the employee quitting the company out of his or her own volition and the latter is the […]

11156 Role of Personal Development in Career Growth

Who do you think is a valuable employee? An individual becomes a burden on his/her organization when he fails to perform additional tasks beyond his/her regular key responsibility areas. Multitalented employees definitely have an edge over those who restrict themselves only to a particular task and fail to contribute in other departments and areas. Organizations […]

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

Review and follow up is important for any process but indispensable after assessments. It is crucial that a comprehensive and robust review mechanism is planned in detail along-with the assessments. When assessments are being used for developmental purposes like for identifying high potential employees, for succession planning or role change, it acts as a navigator for the candidate and the manager to align the development actions based on post assessment feedback.

Even when assessments are done for selection or rejection purposes like promotion it always helps the participants if a short review happens. It prevents de-motivation in people not selected as well as reminds them of the areas that they need to work upon. Frequent reviews and follow ups ensure that the learning continues for all the candidates. Even in the case of selection and hiring, having a short review of their performance with the participants helps the organization distinguish itself as an employer which is transparent and communicates openly.

When assessments are used in Development Center, a detailed Individual Development Plan [IDP] is the end result which outlines the developmental objectives to be achieved by the participant. In the absence of an IDP, review has to be a very detailed process.

So what does a review comprises of after assessment:

  • It has to assess how far the learning or developmental objectives have been achieved
  • How confident the individual feels to undertake the task in future
  • How the newly learned skills or procedures will be used in future
  • Areas which still cause problems or need more practice
  • Aspects of learning found difficult and what can be done to make them easier
  • Kind of support required by the management, HR and the reporting manager
  • Structure and timescale for the learning experience
  • What will be the next stage of learning

The reviewer who may be a reporting manager or the immediate boss has to partner in the learning process of the participant. They have to be aware of the developments and progress they make and also need to understand the difficulties being faced by them. There are some aspects which need to be kept in mind by the reviewer:

Sometimes all does not go well with the participants regarding the entire feedback and developmental actions suggested and the development goals in particular. This may be due to:

  • The participant not making much progress
  • Lower levels of motivation and commitment
  • Confusion regarding the relevance of developmental goals
  • Changing priorities
  • Lack of organizational support

The role of the reviewer, who might be a reporting manager or immediate boss, hence becomes broader in scope with such participants. The most important aspects becoming:

  • Listening patiently to obstacles and difficulties faced by participants/subordinates and take initiative to remove them or suggest alternatives

  • Confronting participants when he/she does not follow through on commitments

  • Speaking directly with the participant even when discussing difficult or sensitive issues

  • Communicating in ways that reflects respect for one’s own worth and the worth of others

Reviews after assessments also provide information regarding the quality of assessments done and feedback provided to the participants.

Article Written by

MSG Team

An insightful writer passionate about sharing expertise, trends, and tips, dedicated to inspiring and informing readers through engaging and thoughtful content.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

The Process of Competency Based Assessment

MSG Team

Ethical Considerations in Competency based Assessments

MSG Team

What is Competency Based Assessment – Meaning and Important Concepts

MSG Team