MSG Team's other articles

8761 Introduction to Organizational Diversity – Meaning and Important Concepts

We often hear the term “diversity” bandied about in our everyday usage. Usually, when we come across the term, it is in the context of having a mix of gender, race, ethnic, sexual orientation etc in a setting wherein there is no discrimination based on these traits. In an organizational context, diversity refers to equality […]

11778 Virtual Teams – Myths and Realities

With an aim to leverage on the global talent, virtual teams are becoming the norm for team work in most of organizations. But there are certain myths that cloud the mindset of the managers/leaders of these virtual teams which does not allow them to utilize their full potential. For the success of virtual team, it […]

11652 Types of Budgets in Public Administration

The public budgets are different from other forms of budgets in many ways; here the voters delegate the power of spending their money to the politicians or the elected representatives. Now having understood the concept of budget in the last article, let us understand the different kinds of budget that are there in the public […]

11903 The Transleader: Strategy, Leadership, and the Soul

One of the big ideas being bandied about in recent times is the interaction of strategy, leadership, and the soul of organizations which when they work in tandem can create exceptional leaders in the 21st century business landscape. This is the premise of the book by Sertl and Huberman who have theorized that for leaders […]

10276 Managing the Transition from Hierarchical to Network Organizational Structures

Introduction The emergence of the network-based organizational structures and a movement away from the hierarchical structures that were the hallmark of the earlier era presents its own set of challenges to Human Resource Managers (HRM) as well as Executive Leadership and Senior Management. The key aspect of the transition from hierarchy to network and from […]

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

The policy of risk management is unique to every organization. Practices that may be considered acceptable in one organization may not be considered acceptable in another organization.

Just like the vision and mission of any company, its risk management policy is also unique. This is a basic document, which is drawn up when the risk management policy of a company is being put into place. It can be considered to be like a constitution since all decisions related to the risk management practices in any company emanate from this document.

Since an organization is made up of several stakeholders, it is important for all those stakeholders to get aligned on the same path so that the risk management policy can be drawn up.

This article explains what a risk management policy is as well as the different steps that need to be taken to draw up a risk management policy.

Drawing up a Risk Management Framework

The primary purpose of a risk policy is to ensure that the organization has a commonly agreed-upon risk management framework in place. This framework has to be developed after due consultation by all stakeholders.

The risk appetite of all stakeholders needs to be matched with the probable outcomes of different risk levels. It is the job of the organization to do a thorough scan of the various risks that an organization faces during this time. The operational and regulatory framework needs to be thoroughly studied before reaching any final conclusions.

Framework For Measuring Risks

Risk management is an imperfect science. This means that there are several different ways that can be used to measure risks. These different methods are likely to give different results.

Hence, if there is no consensus about the mechanisms which have to be used in order to value risk and control it, there will be chaos. It is likely that the management will change the methods repeatedly based on what suits their decisions.

Hence, just like accounting policy decisions, changes in the decisions regarding measurement and valuation of receipt need to be vetted carefully. The valuation methods used for tracking, measuring, and subsequent reporting of risks should be the same to ensure that the results are comparable across the years.

Defining Success

In the previous articles, we have repeatedly mentioned that risk management is not a perfect activity. This means that it is not possible to completely eliminate risk.

Since the whole process is about dealing with imperfection, it is important to define what success means and codify it in the risk management policy. In the absence of such codification, different stakeholders in the risk management policy will have different interpretations of success.

The communication of performance goals and then the subsequent measurement of performance will become vague if the concept of success is not aligned and codified.

It is possible that the definition of success may change over the period of time. Hence, it is recommended that the definition be revised from time to time.

Defining Failure

In the previous step, the company defined certain outcomes that they would be in their interests. At the same time, it is also important to clearly define the outcomes and situations which would not be acceptable to the company. This lack of acceptability could be due to the core cultural values of the company or due to financial constraints.

Regardless, it is important to clarify particular situations such as catastrophe risks, brand risks, and other such risks which must be avoided at all costs. These definitions define the priority areas for the risk management team. They now know that these risks are the most critical ones and need to be managed carefully in any case.

Identify Factors that Would Limit Application of Risk Management

The risk management policy also needs to clearly outline the possible constraints that a company is likely to face while applying its risk management strategies. These could be constraints related to finances, personnel, or even culture. This step will ensure that the risk management strategy prepared is practical and can be strictly implemented. It is important for the risk management team to know the boundaries inside which they need to operate.

Define Baseline Risk Level

The end result of the entire process is to define a baseline risk level. This baseline level will be defined using valuations that will remain consistent across the company and across different time periods. This definition will be used as a guide to mediate between conflicting goals of stakeholders.

For instance, equity shareholders might want the company to take more risks so that their return is increased. However, debt holders get a constant rate of return. Hence, they may see the additional risk as jeopardizing their interest without adding any value to them.

The risk management policy should be able to mediate between such disputes. It should clearly define the baseline level of risk using which such disputes can be objectively settled.

The bottom line is that the risk management policy is the central policy document that needs to be put into place before a risk management department is set up. This document should guide the organization through difficult decisions and should serve as a bible for actions related to risk management.

Article Written by

MSG Team

An insightful writer passionate about sharing expertise, trends, and tips, dedicated to inspiring and informing readers through engaging and thoughtful content.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

The COSO Framework for Internal Control

MSG Team

The Cost Structure in the Insurance Industry

MSG Team

Credit Derivatives: An Introduction

MSG Team