Common Issues with Revenue Generated from Broadcasting Right
February 12, 2025
In the previous article, we studied the concept of convertible debt and some of the common terms which are used while discussing convertible debt. In this article, we will have a closer look at some of the advantages and disadvantages of using this form of debt. Advantages of Using Convertible Debt Many companies continue to […]
Millions of well-intentioned people around the world try to save and invest money every month but fail. They are consistently unable to hit their financial goals and their savings targets. As a result, they give up and decide to continue living a financially undisciplined life. Financial planners have observed many such cases and then they […]
The untrained investor uses profit and profit margin interchangeably. This is not technically correct. The difference may be minor but it is vital. This article will explain about profit margins in detail. Profit vs. Profit Margins Profit and profitability are two different things. Although they may be closely related, they have a subtle difference. Profit […]
In the previous article, we have already discussed what salary caps are and what are the objectives behind implementing them. We also know that there are a couple of different types of salary caps. We also know that the salary cap system is followed in almost every major league across the world. The English Premier […]
If mere numbers are considered, Panaya is a small blip on the radar of the global Information technology behemoth Infosys. The deal is valued at only $316 million dollars which is not even 1% of the valuation of Infosys. However, this Panaya acquisition has shaken the company to its core. It has created a rift […]
We have already seen in the previous articles that the financial size of the global sponsorship market is increasing at a rapid pace. This is largely because of the various benefits that sponsors derive from making sponsorship agreements.
Sponsorship is generally viewed as a cost-effective way of promoting the image of brands in front of their target audience. However, it needs to be understood that like everything else, there are two sides to this coin also.
Hence, on the one hand, sponsors derive benefits from making sponsorship deals whereas, on the other hand, they are also exposed to risks that result from making such deals.
In this article, we will have a closer look at the various risks which are associated with such sponsorship events.
In marketing terminology, this phenomenon is referred to as “image transfer”. We will discuss it in detail in a subsequent article. However, for now, it is enough to know that the sponsor hopes that the positive emotions associated with the sporting league will be transferred to some extent to their brand as well.
However, it is also true that image transfer works in the other direction as well. This means that if the actions of the sporting league or any of its agents create negative emotions about the league, such emotions also get transferred to the sponsor’s brand and start having a negative impact on brand equity.
Hence, there is always a risk that the sponsor may end up paying money to an event which leads to an erosion in their brand equity. This has happened several times in the past as sporting leagues have been associated with various negative political as well as social issues.
It is common for sportsmen and sporting leagues to be involved in various kinds of scandals that create a negative image in the minds of the people. Over the years, sponsors have learned to manage these risks.
Most sponsorship agreements are created in such a way that if there is a negative event, the sponsor of the brand reserves the right to disassociate their brand from the league in a public manner. This helps the brand minimize its risks related to negative exposure.
The cash flows from the sponsor to the league are also planned taking into account the possibility that the sponsor may disassociate from the league midway.
In such cases, the sponsor’s image also takes a hit. Hence, it would be fair to say that the sponsor carries a risk of uncertainty related to the performance. Also, it would not be fair to say that this risk is immaterial if the team being sponsored is a world-class team.
Even teams like Juventus have been relegated to lower leagues because of non-performance over a long period of time in the recent past.
Ambush marketing is when a rival tries to associate itself unofficially with a brand and tries to derive the same benefits or greater benefits without actually paying the cost. Hence, the entire investment made by the sponsor ends up being wasted while the rival is able to obtain benefits.
One example of such ambush marketing is when Coca-Cola decided to become the official sponsor of the 1996 Cricket World Cup. Coca-Cola had paid a good sum of money in order to be associated with the event. On the other hand, Pepsi did not make any such investment.
However, Pepsi was able to come up with a clever tagline that projected Pepsi as being the “cooler” soft drink. Pepsi started bombarding the media with advertisements with the tagline, “Pepsi, nothing official about it! By doing so, they projected Coca-Cola as being an old and boring brand and projected themselves as being young, quirky, and cool.
The end result of this ambush marketing was that Pepsi was more successful in exploiting the marketing potential of the 1996 Cricket World Cup as compared to Coca-Cola. Therefore, it can be said that whenever a brand decides to sponsor an event, they always expose themselves to the possibility of ambush marketing. As a result, this is also a risk that they need to take into account and create a strategy to mitigate the same.
The bottom line is that sponsoring of sports events is a great marketing strategy. However, that does not mean that it is not prone to risks. A sponsor must be able to recognize these risks and create their strategy in such a way that most of these risks are mitigated.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *