Executive Pay: The Curious Case of Carlos Ghosn’s Arrest
February 12, 2025
Abstract The global economic crisis of 2008 brought home to the global investors the stark truth that they need to look beyond the Western economies for generating returns on capital invested. The fact that the BRICS or the emerging markets of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa weathered the economic downturn and were able […]
Introduction: What is IT governance and why it is important? It is not enough for corporations to have IT systems and expect them to deliver strategic value to them. Instead, there needs to be a mechanism in place to regulate, monitor, and govern the value creation efforts of the IT systems. This governance mechanism of […]
Introduction Quality of product and services determines success or failure of the organization. Consumers expect the company to maintain high-level of quality and consider it an important aspect of satisfaction. Quality management, therefore, becomes very important as far as any organization is concerned. Quality management can be accomplished through various quality control techniques. Quality assurance […]
When a management student passes out from college and is absorbed into any business organization, if he is lucky he will get to spend a few months in getting orientation in all departments before being assigned to a particular department or function at the end of the induction program. Those who get to be assigned […]
Introduction: What is IT Strategy and Why it is Important As the joke goes, A person who is sitting in front of a computer and not knowing what to do has been described as Intel Inside and Idiot Outside. Similarly, organizations that do not have an IT strategy in place are akin to clueless organizations […]
Automation is changing the world that we live in at an increasing pace. With each passing day, the capabilities of robots are increasing more and more. They are becoming a sort of pseudo human race as they have acquired almost all the thinking capacity that a human has.
With giant strides in technology taking place, companies are now able to automate tasks that were previously thought to be impossible to automate.
This may seem like a wealth of opportunity to the entrepreneurial class. However, for the average worker, this is a severe threat. It is likely to make them redundant in the next 10 years or so. To prevent this from happening and to ensure that humans and robots have a level playing field, Bill Gates, the wealthiest man in the world has proposed that we tax the robots. Some people think this is a good idea whereas others think it is ridiculous.
In this article, we will weigh the pros and cons of automation to come to a conclusion whether robots should actually be taxed!
The point in favor for taxing the robots is that they will affect the people from the lowest strata the most. Jobs that require less intelligence are easier to automate. Consider the case of driverless cars being tested by Google.
If the experiment is a success, it will be a blow to millions of cab workers worldwide. Also, millions of drivers who work in the logistic industry will be unemployed.
Jobs like these where workers make slightly more than minimum wage are the most under threat. Even in Amazon’s new store, there are no staff members at checkout counters. Low pay retail jobs are also under threat!
Bill Gates is of the opinion that the field is currently tilted in favor of robots. This is because when employers pay their workers a certain sum of money both are supposed to pay taxes, making it expensive to hire workers.
On the other hand, when employers spend on workers there are no taxes at all! It is cheaper to hire robots than it is to hire people. Also, the burden of taxes like social security, Medicaid, etc. falls disproportionately on the lower wage workers.
Bill Gates believes that the amount of money that employers spend on automating the process should be taxed. All this money should be put into a common fund. This fund must then be used to distribute money to every member of the society.
Since people from the lowest strata of the society are likely to lose their jobs due to automation, they are the ones whose incomes should be supplemented.
The flaw with Bill Gates argument is that it has a regressive thought process. Technology does cause disruption in the short run and leads to loss of jobs. However, in the long run, humanity is better off as a result of technology.
Consider the case of the printing press during the industrial revolution. If printing press was taxed during its inception, it would have pushed back humanity by several years.
Technology should be viewed as complementing the workforce. It will extinguish low-end jobs that require no brain and a lot of labor. Instead, it will create high-end jobs, and everyone will be better off.
The governments should focus their efforts on training the workforce to take high-end jobs rather than trying to implement regressive tax regimes that would impede development.
It is not that automation would take away money and jobs from all humans. It would just be a redistribution of wealth from the poor to the wealthy.
Technical people who tell the machines what to do will make a lot of money and so will the people who own the machines. Hence, people with a socialistic bend of mind tend to argue that the purchase of robots needs to be taxed. The problem with this proposal is that it does not make sense.
Firstly, how would you define a robot! Even computers replace human effort, and so does the fan hanging on your ceiling. If every form of machine that reduces human effort is taxed, that would amount to a tax on capital investments.
Taxing capital investments is the equivalent of financial suicide for an economy as it deters growth and creation of new jobs. Rather it breeds stagnation and is almost certain to lead to a recession if it is implemented over a larger period of time.
Lastly, Bill Gates’ proposal is impossible to execute in real life. It is not possible to accurate the differential earning that a robot would generate over a worker.
The wages that have to be paid to the worker, as well as the productivity of the robot, are both uncertain. As a result, it would be difficult to accurately determine the tax base over which taxes have to be levied. Also, it is possible that the manufacturers bundle software with hardware and make it very difficult to determine which product should be taxed and which shouldn’t be.
To sum it up, taxing the robots is a regressive strategy which if implemented is likely to cause more harm than good.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *