MSG Team's other articles

11988 Why is India Following a Loose Monetary Policy?

Ever since the great recession ended in 2009, the entire world has been following loose expansionist monetary policies. However, after a decade of such policies, most countries in the world have now started resorting to monetary tightening. The Federal Reserve has raised interest rates four consecutive times in the past four years. The Reserve Bank […]

9806 Similarities and Differences in Implementation of Quality Frameworks in Manufacturing and Service Sector

Introduction A production defect in a company like GE (General Electric) might result in that specific product or the part being removed from the assembly line and not sent out as finished product. However, in the service sector, a process error might prove to be costly as in the case of the JPMC or Citigroup […]

8789 Six Sigma – Introduction to Measure Phase

The mention of the Measure phase of the Six Sigma module brings into mind pictures of statisticians performing complex operations on data to derive meaning out of it. While this is true to some extent, the complexity of the process is highly over-rated. True, that there is a tremendous amount of statistics involved. However, in […]

9908 Why Indians Must Change Their Work Habits to Become World Class Professionals

Why Indian Professionals need to Change Their Work Habits In recent years, there has been much talk about how India is emerging as a global powerhouse and an engine for economic growth on a global scale. Indeed, with the liberalization of the Indian Economy in the 1990s and the subsequent waves of reform, there has […]

9735 HR and Quality Management in ERP System

Human Resource (HR): Though the pay rolls preparation through bespoke systems is one of the early adoptions of application software in many organizations, HR module was mostly left out by them, during their early phase of implementation of ERP system, apparently due to routine nature of HR functions, involving mostly some staffing activities. However, need […]

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

One of the greatest criticisms that have been mounted against the six sigma methodology is the fact that there is a possibility that the entire system is built on fudged numbers. Statisticians have claimed that the name six sigma is misleading. Here are the reasons why:

3.4 Defects Per Million or 2 Defects Per Billion

The statistical term Six Sigma actually refers to a process in which there will be 2 defects per billion times the process is run. However, the definition of Six Sigma accepted by modern day practitioners is a much easier to follow, 3.4 defects per million. Although even achieving efficiency of 3.4 defects per million, makes the process achieve near zero and therefore negligible defects, the statistical name 6 sigma is misleading. The values 3.4 defects per million, in reality, correspond to 4.5 sigma levels. The balance is accounted for by the 1.5 sigma shift.

Long Term vs. Short Term

The logic behind the 1.5 sigma shift is rooted in empirical studies. Empirical studies have shown that processes tend to fare better in the short term than they actually do in the long term. This is because in the short term, there is only normal process variation that needs to be dealt with. However in the long term cases of special process variation also occur. This results in the process performing at 6 sigma levels in the short run but at 4.5 sigma levels in the long run.

Long Term Dynamic Mean Variation

The long term variation in the process variation is accounted for by one of the two reasons:

  • Variation in the process mean over time
  • Increase in the standard deviation of the process over time

As a result of either of the above reasons, or a combination of both, the process fails to meet its Six Sigma objectives. This phenomenon is called long term dynamic mean variation.

Empirical Studies at Motorola

Now, we know that the Six Sigma criteria are not met because of long term dynamic mean variation. But how do we know that we need to remove 1.5 sigma from both sides of the normal curve. Well, it isn’t a statistical reality but just an industry convention.

Motorola was the pioneer of Six Sigma methodology worldwide. They have made empirical studies about the processes that they have improved and concluded that a 1.5 sigma shift occurs. While many statisticians have called this 1.5 sigma shift arbitrary, the industry wants to go the Motorola Way and 3.4 defects per million which define 4.5 Sigma have become an industry wide accepted definition of a Six Sigma process.

Article Written by

MSG Team

An insightful writer passionate about sharing expertise, trends, and tips, dedicated to inspiring and informing readers through engaging and thoughtful content.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Creating a SIPOC Chart

MSG Team

Check Sheet – A Basic Six Sigma Tool

MSG Team

Challenges Faced in Conducting Voice of Customer Exercise

MSG Team