Strategies Used by American Companies for Tax Avoidance
America has been the hub of financial and entrepreneurial activity ever since the end of World War 2. However, over the past few years, the number of corporations that are using America as their base has been steadily declining. This is because of the unfavorable tax policies in America. America is the only country in […]
Poor Risk Management at the Silicon Valley Bank
The entire world is still trying to grapple with the failure of the Silicon Valley Bank. The impact has been felt across the United States economy and even across the entire world. It is obvious that since the impact has been significant, a lot of time will be spent trying to analyze if this financial […]
How Investment Banks Source Deals?
Investment bankers are intermediaries in the capital-raising process. This means that most of the time, the deals which go through are not pitched by either party but by the intermediaries i.e., investment bankers. Since sourcing a deal is the first step that an investment bank can take towards the generation of revenue, investment banks have […]
Advantages of Banking as a Service
In the previous articles, we have already studied open banking as well as banking as a service. Many people tend to get confused between the two and think that both the terms refer to the same business model. However, this is not the case. Open banking is more of a technical term that is used […]
Portfolio Management Models
Portfolio management refers to the art of managing various financial products and assets to help an individual earn maximum revenues with minimum risks involved in the long run. Portfolio management helps an individual to decide where and how to invest his hard earned money for guaranteed returns in the future. Portfolio Management Models Capital Asset […]
The Indian stock market is abuzz with the news of a hostile takeover. Larsen and Toubro, which is one of the largest and the most iconic information technology firms in the country is trying to forcefully acquire Mindtree which is a medium-sized information technology company. The news is abuzz about how Mindtree promoters do not want to sell to L&T and how L&T is trying every trick in the book to acquire this company.
Prima-facie, the L&T Mindtree takeover seems to be fuelled by the same greed that most hostile takeovers are fuelled with. However, it is also a perfect case study about how regulatory actions indirectly affect the business of all firms working in the industry. The reality is that the Mindtree acquisition bid has less to do with the attractiveness of Mindtree as a target. Instead, this bid is being driven more by the internal conditions which are being faced by L&T.
In this article, we will have a closer look at the internal conditions as well as the regulatory factors which prompted L&T to launch this unsolicited hostile takeover bid.
L&T has found itself in a position where it has a lot of excess cash. The company wants to channel this cash into creating higher growth rates. The software industry provides one of the highest rates of return in India. This is the reason why L&T has decided to make an acquisition in the software space, and Mindtree came into the picture.
It is important to note that Mindtree was not the first choice for L&T when it came to deploying these additional funds. Instead, the company wanted to buy back outstanding shares from the market. This $1.5 billion bid was foiled by the Securities and Exchanges Bureau of India (regulator). The regulator did not allow the buyback offer to go through. SEBI objected because, after the buyback, the debt to equity ratio of L&T would have crossed 2:1. This is against the compliance norms laid down by SEBI.
L&T was not left with too many other options either. The company has already been paying excess dividends. The dividend paid in the year 2016 was a mind-boggling 33% of the annual profit of the company. The problem with raising dividends is that they set expectations for the future. Hence, if dividends are raised now, they cannot be reduced in the future without a sharp reaction from the market. This is the reason why L&T did not choose to take the dividend route.
Mindtree came onto the radar of L&T after its strategic investor tried to offload 20% stake in the company. L&T was quick to pounce on the opportunity and negotiate with VG Siddhartha, who is also the founder of the famous Indian coffee shop chain, Cafe Coffee Day. VG Siddhartha agreed to sell his stake at $600 million. After it became clear that L&T can easily acquire 20% of Mindtree’s business, L&T started aiming for the full company.
The result has been the three-fold plan which is playing out now:
Given the present circumstances and opportunities, L&T feels that Mindtree is the easiest acquisition bet and is hence the best way to increase the return on equity in the short run.
There are rumours that Mindtree promoters are aware of the fact that they don’t really have a choice in the sale. VG Siddhartha’s 20% stake sale seems to have sealed the fate of the company. However, the promoters seem to be negotiating for a better price. They believe that L&T is undercutting them when it comes to the price. L&T has quoted Rs 980 per share. The promoters feel it is a lower bid because Mindtree has been recently priced at 1081 per share. However, L&T seems unlikely to give in. It is insisting that the current price makes Mindtree a value-neutral acquisition. If the share prices are raised the viability of the entire deal may be in jeopardy.
To sum it up, the unsolicited L&T offer and all the takeover drama that followed happened because SEBI disallowed share buybacks and also because a strategic investor wanted to offload his stake quickly.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
