Dutch Auction
Book building has been one of the most widely used methods in the underwriting process. However, over the years, companies have realized that the book-building process is largely controlled by the intermediaries, i.e., the investment banks! The investment banks are the ones building the books. Hence, they can easily control who gets in and at […]
What are Soft Forks?
In the previous article, we have already read about cryptocurrency forks. We now know that a cryptocurrency system is basically software. Just like the software on our phones and laptops cannot stay static, the software responsible for cryptocurrencies cannot stay static either. It needs to be changed from time to time. The changes are done […]
Roadshows in Investment Banking
Roadshows are an important part of the investment banking process. This is because this is the stage where all the stakeholders i.e., the company issuing shares, the investment bankers, as well as potential investors, are all present at the same place. Roadshows are generally undertaken by private companies that are looking to list on a […]
Preferred Shares: An Introduction
Whenever the topic of fixed income securities is considered, the obvious assumption many investors make is that the conversation is about bonds. It is true that bonds are the most commonly traded types of fixed-income securities. However, they are not the only type of fixed-income securities. Preferred shares are another common type of fixed income […]
The Promise and Perils of High Frequency Trading or HFT
What is HFT or High Frequency Trading ? HFT or High Frequency Trading is a process where trading in equities, bonds, derivatives, and just about all financial instruments is done through computers driven by algorithms that determine the trading patterns rather than humans trading on the basis of information. In other words, HFT means that […]
We are now aware of how to use the basic single stage models for both free cash flow to the firm (FCFF) and free cash flow to equity (FCFE). It is now time to look into more advanced models which involve two or more stages for which cash flows will be predicted.
Now, we need to understand that there is no finite number of models for calculating the value of the firm using these metrics. We could have an infinite number of models, if we just tweak the assumptions pertaining to free cash flow to the firm (FCFF) and free cash flow to equity (FCFE) a little bit.
Listing down all the models which are used will overwhelm any students. Instead we must look at what causes the variations in these models. We will do so in this article.
The first question we need to answer is how many stages of cash flow projections we need to assume at arrive at a fair valuation.
Let’s first define what a stage means and why it is important. A stage of cash flow is a group of years wherein the cash flow of the firm will behave in a similar manner.
For instance, if a firm will experience a 7% growth in its free cash flows for the next 5 years, then for calculation ease we can combine these 5 years into 1 stage and use a single formula to derive a valuation for all these five years.
The common variations used are two stage, three stage and even spreadsheet modeling wherein every year is considered separately and the concept of stages does not apply at all.
The number of stages that are used by the analyst in valuation are connected to the characteristic of the firm being valued.
In the forthcoming years, the firm may experience positive cash flows growing at a high rate and then the growth rate may fall down before finally the free cash flows stabilize. In this case, a three stage model may be relevant
Hence, based on the characteristics of the firm, the relevant model may be decided.
The next question which arises is that which metric of free cash flow should be used. Would free cash flow to the firm provide a more accurate forecast? Or would free cash flow to equity be more relevant? This is a fairly simple question to answer.
If we are only considering the point of view of equity shareholders, then we must use free cash flow to equity. In other cases, free cash flow to the firm may be used. So every model will have two variations like two stage model using free cash flow to the firm and two stage model using free cash flow to equity.
The next question pertains to how to calculate the growth rates for the cash flow metric choses. When we were using dividends, we had no option but to make assumptions regarding what the growth rate of dividends will be.
When it comes to free cash flows, we have two options:
For instance, we could use changes in net borrowing and working capital investment as input and derive free cash flow to equity as output. This model is more accurate. However, it also necessitates that the analyst must have access to information about how the company plans to change its cash flows in future periods.
For a short period of time, let’s say 5 years, this information is obtainable. Beyond that, it is pure speculation since not even the company would be in a position to make an accurate forecast for such a long time horizon.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Calculating Free Cash Flow to the Firm: Method #2: Cash Flow From Operations
February 12, 2025
