MSG Team's other articles

12789 Issues in Revenue Sharing in Sports Leagues

A sports league becomes profitable when it is successfully run over many years. This means that almost all the teams participating in the league must be competitive. Now, the amount of money that a team has deeply influences its competitive ability. For instance, a team with more funds is likely to be able to afford […]

9943 Initial Coin Offerings: A Primer

We all know about initial public offerings. These events are held to issue new stock and sell them to the general population. The stock has value because it is a claim on the underlying assets of the company. However, very few of us are aware of the term initial coin offerings. These events are also […]

11132 Role of Investment Bankers in Derivatives Market

The derivatives department is a highly specialized department in the modern-day investment bank. This is because, in terms of size, the derivatives department easily dwarfs all other departments in the investment bank. For instance, the worldwide market for derivative contracts is said to be valued at $79 trillion! This is definitely a notional value since […]

9261 Extrapolation: The Root Cause behind the Bubbles

They say that there is no smoke without fire. This is true of many things and one of them is asset bubbles. It is true that all asset bubbles begin their initial upward movement based on some genuinely good positive news. However, somewhere along the way, the amount of smoke far exceeds the underlying fire […]

8848 Dealing With Special Claims during Bankruptcy

The bankruptcy process takes a long period of time to resolve. During this time frame, the company takes the protection of the legal system. The legal system makes provisions for discharging the previous claims on the assets of the company in a fair and equitable manner. However, the bankruptcy process is quite complex. It has […]

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

The process of negotiations between startup companies and investors is often hotly debated and contested. There are several points of contention between the two parties. However, the two parties are often able to reconcile most of their differences. However, when it comes to controlling of the startup firm, both the startup founders as well as prospective investors tend to take an aggressive stance. Both parties want to retain as much control of the startup firm as possible.

The concept of veto rights is often used by investors to gain some control over the startup firm. In this article, we will try to understand what veto rights are and how these rights affect the interests of all the parties involved.

What are Veto Rights?

In any company, the decisions related to the company are taken based on a majority vote. Hence, in the case of startups, this would mean that the party which has 51% of the vote will be in control of the decision-making. The other parties cannot unilaterally stop a decision if 51% of the shareholders back it. This is considered to be problematic from an investor’s point of view.

It is common for investors to have 10% or 25% voting power in a company. Hence, in most cases, their opinions will have no bearing on the decisions being taken by the government.

This is where the concept of veto rights comes into play. Veto rights are a legal arrangement that does not allow the investors to unilaterally take decisions on behalf of the majority shareholders. However, at the same time, they allow the minority shareholders to unilaterally prevent the implementation of any decision made by the majority stakeholder. Hence, even if an investor controls 10% of the shareholding, they can prevent the decision being taken by the other 90% from being implemented.

This is the reason that investors are keen on obtaining these rights as a part of their investment agreement. However, at the same time, founders are skeptical about signing away these rights.

Importance of Veto Rights

From an investor’s point of view, veto rights can be considered to be very important. In the absence of these veto rights, they would have very little information and control over their investments. Normally, investors have no interest in interfering with the day-to-day operations of the firm. Instead, the investors are more concerned about managing events that are outside the normal course of business.

For instance, if the founders decide to take the second round of funding at a lower valuation then the decision also impacts the existing investors. Similarly, if the startup founder wants to drastically increase the size of the option pool by diluting the shares of the current investors, then also the current investors are impacted.

These investors want to have a defense mechanism ready to protect them in such special cases. Interference in day-to-day operations would create chaos in the startup company and would end up being a lose-lose proposition for both parties.

Types of Veto Rights

Almost no startup founder would be willing to give away complete veto rights. This means that they cannot allow investors to use veto rights against every decision. Hence, a legal setup is created in which the investor can use their veto rights only in the case of certain decisions.

  1. Reserved Veto Rights: A list of certain types of issues is agreed upon between the founders and the investors. These issues are called reserved issues. Hence, startup founders need to take the approval of the investors only on these issues. In case of regular issues, the co-founders can continue taking decisions independently.

    The list of these issues is generally restricted to topics that directly impact the valuation and dilution of existing shares. Founders also try to ensure that the veto rights are provided to all groups of investors. If only a certain group of investors has veto rights, they can hold the startup company hostage to special interests.

  2. Exit Veto Rights: It is possible to provide exit veto rights to only a certain group of investors. Hence, they cannot use their veto rights for any other purposes. However, if they feel that the founder is selling their shares at a lower valuation or to a hostile party, then they can use their exit veto rights.

    It is also common for investors with the highest purchase price to receive such veto rights. This is because the other shareholders may be willing to sell the company since they receive a higher return even at a lower price.

  3. Waiver Veto Rights: Waiver veto rights are the opposite of normal veto rights. In the normal scenario, the decision is made by the majority shareholders and the minority can reject this decision. However, when waiver veto rights are given, the majority shareholders waive off their rights to make decisions about certain matters.

    These rights lie only with the minority shareholders who may be the beneficiary of such clauses. Founders are often not comfortable providing waiver veto rights. These rights are only provided if the investors have a commanding bargaining position and the founder has very few options.

However, the bottom line is that veto powers provide very important legal rights to minority investors. Hence, these powers are highly valued by investors. Companies can expect their valuation to be raised significantly if they are willing to provide veto powers to the investors.

Article Written by

MSG Team

An insightful writer passionate about sharing expertise, trends, and tips, dedicated to inspiring and informing readers through engaging and thoughtful content.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Convertible Notes and Startup Funding

MSG Team

Cash Burn Rate: The Basics

MSG Team