Calculating Free Cash Flow to the Firm: Method #2: Cash Flow From Operations
February 12, 2025
Hidden Assumption: The cost volume profit analysis has a rogue assumption. This rogue assumption believes that the cost volume profit analysis is completely scalable. We know that this is not the case. We operate in a finite world and have finite resources. We show this in our analysis when we write down the relevant range […]
Pension funds are one of the most regulated financial investment vehicles in the world. Pension funds all over the world are subject to various types of restrictions. These restrictions affect every part of the pension funds’ operations. The governance mechanisms have to rigorously be followed while funds are being taken in, invested, accounted for, and […]
Corporate income tax is collected when there is corporate income i.e. when the revenue collected by the corporation exceeds the expenses incurred by this. However, this need not always be the case. It is equally possible that a corporation may incur more expenses than it earns in revenue, thereby incurring a loss. This is truer […]
For a long period of time, the term outsourcing has been associated with cost reductions. Outsourcing is generally considered to be an operational tool or at best a tactical tool. However, this has changed in the past few years. There are many companies across the world which have outsourced or offshored some of their functions […]
Causes of Failure of Job Order Costing: The following is the list of the most probable causes that would cause the job order costing system of the company to fail: Adequate System Not In Place: Job order costing requires an elaborate system in place. In earlier times this was done with the help of paperwork […]
In the previous article, we became aware that the value of a stock can be split into two parts. One part is the horizon period i.e. the period chosen by the analyst for which they believe they can accurately forecast the financials of the company and therefore its dividends. This part remains the same when the calculation is done as per Gordon Growth model as well.
The second part is the terminal value. This is where the Gordon growth formula becomes important. The Gordon growth model simply assumes that the dividends of a stock keep of increasing forever at a given constant rate. Let us understand this with the help of an example.
Let’s say that an analyst wants to forecast the value of a given stock. He is using the dividend discount model to do so. He selects a 5 year horizon period for which he will project the most accurate possible dividend projections. Beyond that he will consider the stock to be perpetuity.
Let’s assume that the firm will pay dividends of $4, $5, $6, $7 and $8 in each of the 5 years of the horizon period. The normal dividend discount model will assume that the firm will continue paying, let’s say $10 dividend from the 6th year to perpetuity. This means that the dividends being forecasted are constant.
In this case too, we will assume that the firm pays 4, $5, $6, $7 and $8 in each of the 5 years of the horizon period. This is the part where both the models remain the same. However, instead of assuming that the dividend from 6th year onwards will remain constant at $10, the Gordon growth model assumes that the dividend will keep on increasing at a constant rate. So, if this rate was 10%, then the dividend for the 7th year will be $11 and that of the 8th year will be $12.21. It then calculates the terminal value as a growing perpetuity instead of it being an ordinary perpetuity.
This assumption is obviously more viable given the fact that dividends do actually grow year on year. Hence, instead of assuming that they will stop growing instantly we can assume that they will grow at a given constant rate till eternity.
According to the Gordon growth model, the value of the stock is derived from two parts:
Value = Present Value of Horizon + Terminal Value
The terminal value is then calculated as a growing perpetuity. There is some complex mathematics behind the derivation of this formula. However, that is not what we are concerned with.
The formula simply is:
Terminal Value = (D1/(r-g)) where:
For instance, in the above case, the terminal value can be calculated as follows, if the rate of return expected by the investors is 12%
D1 = $11, r = 12% and g = 10%
Therefore, the terminal value for the above stock is $550
The Gordon model only works if the rate of return expected by the investors i.e. r is greater than the constant growth rate that is assumed by the investor i.e. “g”. Hence, r always has to be greater than g. g could even be a negative number implying that dividends are declining at a steady rate. However, it cannot be equal to or greater than r.
Also, not that we did not take the first value from the terminal period i.e. the dividend of 6th year i.e. $10. For our purpose, that should be considered D0. We need to use the value of the second dividend that is paid in the terminal period i.e. D1. Alternatively, we could use D0*(1+g) which is the same thing as D1
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *