MSG Team's other articles

9334 What is a Financial Market

A market is a place where two parties are involved in transaction of goods and services in exchange of money. The two parties involved are: Buyer Seller In a market the buyer and seller comes on a common platform, where buyer purchases goods and services from the seller in exchange of money. What is a […]

11644 The Twitter Story

The mega-success of social media sites is not news for anyone. Social media companies such as Facebook and Instagram have become global behemoths within a small period of time. These companies also have multi-billion dollar revenues and cash flows which reinforces their position in the market. Twitter is another social media company that is often […]

9340 Financial Modelling For Leveraged Buyouts (LBOs)

Just like mergers and acquisitions, modeling for leveraged buyouts (LBOs) also requires special skill and knowledge. In this article, we will have a closer look at how leveraged buyouts work as well as how financial modeling techniques need to be adopted to meet the needs of investors indulging in LBO’s. What is a Leveraged Buyout? […]

12048 Working Capital to Sales Ratio – Meaning, Formula, Assumptions and Interpretation

Formula Working Capital to Sales Ratio = Working Capital / Sales Meaning Stating the working capital as an absolute figure makes little sense. Consider two companies, both having the same working capital of USD 100. While one company uses this working capital to generate sales of USD 500, the other uses the same amount as […]

11186 Sale of Assets during Bankruptcy

When a company is facing bankruptcy, it tries to free up as much capital as possible. This freed up capital is used to finance the operations of the firm. One way to free up the capital is to sell fixed assets of the firm. During the bankruptcy process, it is possible for a company to […]

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

Corporate America is flush with cash! Collectively, the Amazons’, Apples’ and other such publicly traded mega corporations account for close to $2 trillion in cash. This excessive hoarding of cash in unparalleled in financial history and hence has left a lot of economists flummoxed.

In this article, we will try to understand why American corporations are holding on to piles of cash instead of investing it.

The Problem with Piles of Cash

Financial and non-financial firms hold cash for very different reasons. It is not unusual for financial firms to hold on to a lot of cash. Hence, in order to be fair, it is important that only the cash holdings on non-financial firms are being considered in this article. However, that does not seem to make too much of a difference since non-financial firms account for $1.6 trillion of this cash pile.

Huge cash piles have traditionally been considered to be a problem for the company holding them. This is because if a company is holding a lot of cash, it means that the company is holding less of other assets. The problem with cash is that in the short run, the yield is abysmal. If cash is held in a savings account or a money market account, the yield is negligible. In some cases, the yield may even be negative. Therefore, normally, companies do not hold much cash since it depresses their own return on equity.

However, hoarding cash is bad for the overall economy as well. The stockpiles of cash being held by Amazon or Apple could be used by small businesses to meet their liquidity needs. By holding on to huge sums of cash, these corporate giants are preventing the circulation of cash and reducing the velocity of money. When the velocity of money reduces, the result is seen in slower GDP growth. Hence, it would be fair to say that American multinational corporations are withholding the growth of thousands of small businesses worldwide.

Why are American Companies Holding this Cash?

According to economic theory, there are only two reasons to hold on to cash:

  1. First is the transaction motive. If companies are afraid that they may not be able to raise funds when needed, they tend to hoard cash. This allows them to be less dependent on banks and other financial institutions. The fact that recession may just be around the corner gets a lot of companies worried about their finances. Excess cash allows the firms to be self-sufficient and avoid the resultant stress. However, only a small amount of cash is required for this purpose. There is no need to hoard $1.6 trillion for purely transactional purposes. Hence, it would be safe to assume that most of the cash being held in corporate vaults is not for self-defense.
  2. The second and most likely reason to hold on to large amounts of cash is tax avoidance. A large chunk of this $1.6 trillion cash is being held by American corporations in offshore accounts. As per the current tax law, American corporations are supposed to pay tax on the income that they generate all over the world. However, this tax only becomes payable when the money is repatriated back to America. American corporations are using this provision as a loophole. They are not transferring the cashback to America. As a result, they are indefinitely deferring the tax payment by keeping the money stashed abroad. If these firms want to invest money in any other country apart from America, they can mobilize the funds directly to the destination and avoid paying taxes in America altogether.

The Argument for a Tax Holiday

This big stockpile of American cash has been a lot in the news lately. As a result, it has tempted many American lawmakers to argue that a tax holiday should be provided to these corporations which are already worth billions of dollars. According to these lawmakers, there should be a fixed period of time when companies should be allowed to repatriate their cash without having to pay any taxes. They believe that this will spur more investments in America and lead to more job creation.

The problem is that American corporations are already known for paying painfully low amounts of tax. Companies like Amazon have a bad reputation since people believe that they earn billions but don’t pay any taxes. Hence, convincing the American taxpayer to provide another tax holiday is going to be a difficult task.

On top of that, there are several American corporations which have actually done the opposite. Many corporations have taken tax holidays and reduced their workforce instead of increasing it. For instance, pharmaceutical giant Merck was allowed to repatriate close to $6 billion tax-free in 2005. However, within a year, the company fired more than 4000 American workers! Similarly, other companies such as Hewlett Packard have also fired 15000 personnel after getting a tax holiday over an income of $15 billion.

It is high time that the government stops succumbing to corporate blackmail. American companies are obliged to report their incomes in America. The government should change the tax laws to ensure that a big chunk of this cash is either invested or repatriated back to America.

Article Written by

MSG Team

An insightful writer passionate about sharing expertise, trends, and tips, dedicated to inspiring and informing readers through engaging and thoughtful content.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

What is Cost of Equity? – Meaning, Concept and Formula

MSG Team

Cross Border Credit Reporting

MSG Team

What is Corporate Finance? – Meaning and Important Concepts

MSG Team