MSG Team's other articles

9853 Middle Level Management – Sandwich Layer and its Importance to Organizations

In previous articles, at many places, we have discussed how the middle management is in the unique position of actualizing change in organizations. We have talked about how the middle management needs to be brought on board for any meaningful change and how the senior leadership cannot alone get things going in any organization. The […]

10596 Perceptual Illusions and Constancies

Perceptual illusion occurs when a stimulus is perceived inaccurately. It can equally be explained as a sensory distortion in scientific parlance. How to Describe Illusions? Illusions provide us important clues on the information processing capabilities of our brain. Even scientific investigations by way of empirical researches may have limitations because the information perceived by way […]

9655 How Organizations Should Deal with Sexual Harassment in the Present Times

In recent months, there have been several instances of women across the economic and social groups coming forward with complaints and retelling of the cases of sexual harassment and gender discrimination against authority figures. For instance, Harvey Weinstein, the Hollywood Director and Scriptwriter have found himself in the center of a raging storm where several […]

11613 Trait Theory of Leadership – Advantages and its Limitations

The trait model of leadership is based on the characteristics of many leaders – both successful and unsuccessful – and is used to predict leadership effectiveness. The resulting lists of traits are then compared to those of potential leaders to assess their likelihood of success or failure. Scholars taking the trait approach attempted to identify […]

10177 Limitations of Reinsurance Contracts

In the previous few articles, we have studied how reinsurance contracts work. We now have a deep understanding of the type of relationship between the ceding insurance company as well as the reinsurer. We now know about the various types of clauses which are commonly included in the reinsurance contract as well as the financial […]

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

We have heard the story several times. A large conglomerate wants to implement a change management program, which it then announces amidst much fanfare and hype. The top leadership waxes eloquent on the need to change and why the organization must actualize change.

However, a few years down the line, things are still bad for the company and the change program has bitten the dust. What are the reasons for this?

First, there is something called “change fatigue” that sets in when the change being instituted is part of a long string of change management programs that have been going on in the organization.

Second, the resistance to change (a topic we discussed at length in previous articles) is the next reason.

Third, the employees might have little faith in the top management and the confidence in the management team is at such a situation that the employees do not take anything that the management says seriously.

Therefore, the obvious question is what the management should do to actualize change.

First, create an engaged organization where the buy-in for the change is secured deep and wide within the organizational hierarchy. This means that the “Sandwich Layer” of middle management and the key power centers in the organizations are on the same page as the management.

Second, have execution clarity, which means that the top management knows what it wants and how it should go about actualizing change. The message of change must be lucid and coherent and the senior as well as the other layers of management must think through the change process.

Third, create a critical mass of “enabled leaders” who would carry through the change and who know what exactly the change entails and how to go about it.

Fourth, the senior management must realize that “in unity lies strength” and hence, must build a cohesive organizational culture that does not fray at the edges or is hollow in the middle.

In other words, there needs to be a sense of purpose about the change process and how it must be actualized by all levels of management.

Fifth and finally, the Project Management Office and the Governance structures responsible for change must articulate, implement, seek feedback, and close out the change process as well as plug any leakages.

The important point to note here is that the PMO must be vested with full powers to implement the change and as happens with economies and politics, governance mechanisms in organizations must not be clogged.

In other words, the organizational arteries must be clear and free from appendages. If these elements of the change management process are taken into account, actualizing the change would be relatively easy.

Finally, the whole point of the change program must be to engage with the employees at all levels and ensure that the change management program targets the core of the organizations competencies and vision and mission.

In conclusion, change management programs can only succeed when these elements are conjoined together to create a coherent and understandable narrative that the employees can relate to.

Article Written by

MSG Team

An insightful writer passionate about sharing expertise, trends, and tips, dedicated to inspiring and informing readers through engaging and thoughtful content.


Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *