Difference between Aggregator and Marketplace Business Models
In the previous articles, we have already studied the aggregator as well as the marketplace business models. These two types of business models have taken the start-up community by storm in recent years. Many start-ups which have become successful and have gone on to become unicorns are using some variants of this model in different […]
How Does The Failure of Silicon Valley Bank Affect Stakeholders
The fall of the Silicon Valley Bank happened very suddenly. The bank had gone from a healthy functioning bank to near bankruptcy within 48 hours! As a result, the credibility of the entire American banking system has been brought into question. This is because commercial banks are not like regular organizations. In most cases, they […]
Recency Bias
There is a common saying in the investment markets that “In the short run, the markets are a voting machine whereas, in the long run, they are a weighing machine.” This saying is often said in order to emphasize the role of long term investment. People with short term goals often fail to perform well […]
Limitations of Behavioral Finance
The theory of behavioral finance has become exceedingly popular in the past few years. This is largely because of the fact that it mixes the dry, numerical subject of finance with the interesting world of psychology. Most people who read about biases described in behavioral finance books often have a “me too” moment. The biases […]
Gender Gap in Pension Systems
The gender gap in pension systems around the world is a very real and pressing issue. Numerous studies have been conducted on this matter and almost all of them have concluded that the gender gap is a systematic problem that needs to be addressed by pension funds as well as by pension fund regulators across […]
In the previous articles, we have discussed the concept of convertible notes. We have also seen the various pros and cons of convertible notes. However, convertible notes are not the only hybrid security that can be used by startups if they want to raise funds. A Silicon Valley-based startup accelerator named “Y Combinator” has created another type of financial instrument called “Simple Agreement for Future Equity” i.e. SAFE. This type of financial instrument is similar to convertible notes but also has some special features. In this article, we will have a closer look at the concept of SAFE as well as its real-life applications.
Simple agreement for future equity (SAFE) can be considered to be similar to convertible debt in the sense that it is a financial instrument that allows investors to invest their money in a startup now in return for shares which will be provided at a later date. However, in the case of convertible debt, there are extensive negotiations between the startup founders and the investors. This is not the case when it comes to Simple agreements for future equity (SAFE). The SAFE instrument emphasizes the “simplicity” of the transaction. The standard agreement developed by Y Combinator for the SAFE instrument is a simple five-page agreement. The only two variables that need to be discussed are the amount of investment that the investor is willing to make as well as the valuation cap.
Apart from simplicity, Simple agreement for future equity (SAFE) is different from convertible notes in the sense that it is not a debt instrument. From the very first day of the investment, a Simple agreement for future equity (SAFE) does not obligate the startup towards making any monthly interest payments. Also, there is no maturity date for Simple agreement for future equity (SAFE) instruments. This is the major difference that makes this financial instrument completely different from convertible notes.
The SAFE instrument can be of various types. The variation in the different types of instruments stems from the way in which these instruments are converted to equity. Some of the common variations have been listed below:
There is another variation in the type of Simple agreement for future equity (SAFE) which is available in the market. SAFE instruments can be further classified as pre-money SAFE and post-money SAFE. The difference between the two is that in the case of pre-money SAFE, the investors do not know the percentage of the company that they will own once the SAFE is converted into equity. This percentage is dependent upon the priced rounds of investments. On the other hand, when it comes to post-money SAFE, the investors are very sure about the percentage of equity they will hold in a company after the SAFE is converted into equity shares.
Even though Simple agreement for future equity (SAFE) is considered to be a very “simple” financial instrument, investors and founders would be better off if they knew exactly what to expect if the following events were to take place.
The bottom line is that SAFE is a different type of financial instrument as compared to convertible notes. SAFE is considered to be more founder-friendly since it does not immediately put them under a debt burden. However, it is not used by many investors for the exact same reason.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
